A Retrospective Comparative Study of Clinicopathological Features in High-Grade and Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma

Authors

  • Jonathan Ham Department of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia
  • Andi S.H.D. Nasser Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia
  • Rina Masadah Department of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia
  • Syahrul Rauf Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia
  • Berti J. Nelwan Department of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia
  • Upik A Miskad Department of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia
  • Muhammad H Cangara Department of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia
  • Suryani Tawali Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22487/htj.v11i1.1558

Keywords:

High-grade serous carcinoma, Low-grade serous carcinoma, Clinicopathology

Abstract

Backgroud: Ovarian carcinoma is the third most common malignancy in Indonesian women after breast and cervical cancer. Serous ovarian carcinoma is the most frequent subtype, divided into low-grade and high-grade types, each with distinct genetic and biological characteristics. Objective:
This study aims to compare the clinicopathological features of high-grade and low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using 77 paraffin-embedded samples of serous ovarian carcinoma. Clinical and pathological data including age, body mass index (BMI), age at menarche, and parity were collected and analyzed using the chi-square test. Results: Patients aged >50 years accounted for most cases, with 64.3% presenting high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). Overweight/obesity was observed in 40.3% of cases. Early menarche (<13 years) was reported in 78%, and 42.7% were multiparous. No significant differences were found in clinical variables between HGSC and low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC). Histopathologically, HGSC showed more pronounced cytologic atypia, necrosis, and metastasis. Conclusion: High-grade serous carcinoma demonstrates greater aggressiveness compared to its low-grade counterpart. Histopathological assessment plays a critical role in diagnosis, treatment decisions, and prognosis evaluation.

References

Miyagawa C, Nakai H, Otani T, et al. Histopathological subtyping of high-grade serous ovarian cancer using whole slide imaging. J Gynecol Oncol. 2023;34(4):e47. doi:10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e47

Bowtell DD, Böhm S, Ahmed AA, et al. Rethinking ovarian cancer II: reducing mortality from high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15(11):668-679. doi:10.1038/nrc4019

Kumar V, Abbas AK, Aster JC. Robbins & Cotran Pathologic Basic of Disease. 10th ed. Elsevier; 2020.

Board WC of TE. Female Genital Tumours. 5th ed. World Health Organization; 2020.

American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2022. Atlanta: American Cancer Society. Published online 2022.

Lisio MA, Fu L, Goyeneche A, Gao Z hua, Telleria C. High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer: Basic Sciences, Clinical and Therapeutic Standpoints. IJMS. 2019;20(4):952. doi:10.3390/ijms20040952

Wandira NA, Dinengsih S, Novelia S. Analysis of Ovary Cancer in the Gynecology Room. MIDPRO. 2023;15(1):166-179. doi:10.30736/md.v15i1.506

Solikhah S, Perwitasari D, Rejeki D. Geographic Characteristics of Various Cancers in Yogyakarta Province, Indonesia: A Spatial Analysis at the Community Level. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022;23(4):1231-1238. doi:10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.4.1231

Berek JS, Renz M, Kehoe S, Kumar L, Friedlander M. Cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: 2021 update. Intl J Gynecology & Obste. 2021;155(S1):61-85. doi:10.1002/ijgo.13878

Goldblum JR, Lamps LW, McKenney JK. Rosai and Ackerman’s Surgical Pathology. Elsevier; 2017.

Hoffman BL, Schorge JO, Bradshaw KD, Halvorson LM, Schaffer JI, Corton MM. Williams Gynecology. 3rd ed. McGraw Hill/Medical; 2016.

Koshiyama M, Matsumura N, Konishi I. Recent concepts of ovarian carcinogenesis: Type i and type II. BioMed Research International. 2014;2014(1). doi:10.1155/2014/934261

Downloads

Published

2025-01-31

How to Cite

Ham, J., Nasser, A. S., Masadah, R., Rauf, S., Nelwan, B. J., Miskad, U. A., Cangara, M. H., & Tawali, S. (2025). A Retrospective Comparative Study of Clinicopathological Features in High-Grade and Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma. Healthy Tadulako Journal (Jurnal Kesehatan Tadulako), 11(1), 141-147. https://doi.org/10.22487/htj.v11i1.1558

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)